Sunday, September 10, 2006
Observing the Sun in different wavelenghts
Yesterday I observed some interesting active regions on the Sun, especially AR 908. I used the 4-inch refractor and the Baader Herschel Wedge (with the Baader Continuum and ND 3.0 filters) for "white light"? observing and the Coronado PST for the H-Alpha line.
I tried different eyepieces with the 4-inch TAL: the Vixen LV's, the Zeiss vario zoom-eyepiece and a 32mm Televue Plossl. The best overall view I got was from the 32mm Plossl. At a magnification of 30x the granulation was at its best, even better than in the Zeiss zoom. I noticed that the granulation gradually fades away with increasing magnification. I also compared the Zeiss zoom eyepiece (25-10mm) with the Vixen LV's (20, 15, 12, 10, 9, 7 and 5mm). Although the views through the high quality Zeiss zoom were slightly sharper and clearer than through the Vixen LV's, I still prefer the LV's for their great eye-relief of 20mm. With the Coronado PST I only used the 15mm LV. This eyepiece showed me the most pleasant view, and higher magnifications added almost nothing.
The visual impression you get from Sunspots with the Baader Herschel Wedge and the 4-inch refractor is hard to describe. No image I shoot comes near the sharp and detailed view I get live at the eyepiece, but I always shoot a few images to document the observing session in my observing log. The image below was shot with the Nikon Coolpix mounted on the Herschel Wedge using the 32mm Televue Plossl. The camera settings were 100 ISO, f 5.1, 1/125s and 4x optical zoom.

Click to enlarge!
In the centre of the image you see the active region 908. The more or less pear-shaped group has an area with a few umbra’s that seem to form one large umbra in the form of a cloverleaf. To the left of this almost circular feature lie several smaller dark umbra-like areas, divided by one or two light-bridges, I detected at a magnification of 100 times. The whole group is surrounded by a penumbra, which is also breached by the Lightbridge’s. The Lightbridge’s are not very clear on the image, but visually they where absolutely visible, as where the inner and outer bright ring around some parts of the umbra / penumbra. There where no faculae around AR 908 or on any other part of the Sun.
In H-alpha, the darker umbra’s where very easy to see, but I detected no bright patches in the AR 908 area (plages or flares). I did see two large bright areas around AR 907 and AR 909 (the two smaal groups towards the right edge of the image). Between 907 and 908 I detected a long, snakelike bright area. There where only a few smaller prominences visible. Between AR 908 and the edge of the solar disk I detected two dark filaments.
Posted by
Math on 09/10 at 02:47 PM |
(5)
Comments |
filed in:
Solar log |
Print
Sunday, August 20, 2006
On the wing of the Swan: The Veil Nebula
After three heat waves and weeks of hot and sunny weather in June and July, August brought nothing but clouds and rain. Last night however, from 23.00hrs until 00.30 (local time) large gaps started to appear in the cloud cover. The sky looked very transparent, so I got out my 20x80 binoculars and the 85mm Zeiss. I first scanned the Milky Way in Cygnus with the big binoculars, and the amount of stars visible was simply stunning, indeed a very clear and transparent sky.
I suddenly remembered an article I read in Zenit, a Dutch astronomy magazine. There I read an article on observing objects in Cygnus with some wonderful sketches from Fred Hissink, a very experienced deep sky observer from the Netherlands. He had observed (and made a sketch) of NGC 6888, the Crescent Nebula. He used an 80mm Megrez 80II ED and an OIII filter. If he could observe the Crescent nebula with an 80mm, the Veil Nebula, also known as Cygnus Loop or Cirrus Nebula, shouldn’t be a problem for my 85mm Zeiss. I got out the 32mm Televue Plossl and the Lumicon OIII filter, scanned the area around 52 Cygnus and there it was, the Veil nebula. The eastern part of the Veil, NGC 6992-95, was clearly with direct vision, thanks to the OIII. The western part, NGC 6960, which is situated around a bright star, Cygnus 52, took a little longer to detect. After barely suspecting it at first sight, I could detect a small part of the nebulosity using averted vision and adding a little movement to the small refractor. If the western part would have been visible with direct vision, the whole Cygnus loop would have fitted into the 3.2-degree field of view nicely. The Cygnus loop has a diameter of 6 full Moons.
As I mentioned earlier, the whole nebulosity is called Cygnus Loop, Cirrus Nebula or Veil Nebula. To add a little to the confusion, according to Stephen James O’Meara, the eastern segment, consisting of NGC 6992-95 (and IC 1340), is also known as the Network Nebula, the western segment as the Filamentary Nebula. Anyway, whatever the name, it is a beautiful object and I can’t wait for my new 12-inch dob to arrive and have a look at the Veil! I can only say get out there and have a good look at this celestial treasure. For me, visual observing and the aesthetic beauty of all the different objects is the main reason why I’m into amateur astronomy, and the Veil is one of my favorites. Even under light polluted skies this wonderful nebula can be seen even with a small telescope and the right filter.
Below you find a finder chart and a more detailed chart that should give you an idea what the size of the object is in a 3-degree field of view (like my Zeiss with the 32mm plossl). Click on the images to enlarge. Both images have been made with SkyTools2 from CapellaSoft.


« Collapse
Posted by
Math on 08/20 at 02:54 PM |
(3)
Comments |
filed in:
Deepsky log |
Print
Friday, August 18, 2006
A quick look at the Sun
In the afternoon the Sun came out for a few minutes, so I quickly got out the 4-inch refractor and the Herschel-Wedge. There was a wonderful active region visible, AR 0904. The umbra looked jet-black against the "Green" Sun. I use the Baader Herschel-Wedge combined with a 3.0 neutral density filter and the Baader Continuum Filter. Simply beautiful. For visual observing of the Sun in white light, I never had any better views than with this fine piece of equipment. The image does not come close to what I really observed, but it should give you an idea. I stacked it from 235 frames from some video-footage I shot with my Canon camcorder. I used Registax for stacking.

Posted by
Math on 08/18 at 05:17 PM |
(0)
Comments |
filed in:
Solar scraps |
Print
Friday, August 04, 2006
I made it into NightSky
I just got a preview-copy of the September/October issue of NightSky magazine. My “Clavius” close-up was published in the “Skyscapes” section. Click on to image below to enlarge. It’s a scan from the entry in the magazine.

If you are interested in NightSky magazine or Sky and Telescope,
click on this link to get to their new website.
Enjoy!
Posted by
Math on 08/04 at 05:07 AM |
(2)
Comments |
filed in:
Books and magazines |
Print
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Observing the Sun from the shade
I have been observing the Sun for over a year now, using the Coronado PST and TAL 100RS (combined with the Baader Herschel Wedge). One of the problems I noticed during all the observing sessions was getting a good view of the Sun while you are sitting in the direct sunlight. I used to put a black T-shirt over my head, but I can tell you, you feel like your head starts to melt within a few minutes.
Two months ago I decided to try a big plate of Styrofoam. I just cut two holes in it with a box cutter, so it fits over the PST and the 4-inch refractor. To be honest, it works perfectly for me. Now I sit much more relaxed behind the eyepiece. The views are much better, and the white Styrofoam keeps of the heat as well. If I want to have a real good view through the PST, I still use the black T-shirt, but because I do not get direct sunlight on my head, this isn’t a problem anymore. My advise for solar-observers: get behind some kind of white plate, and of you are looking in H-alpha, make your surroundings as dark as possible. I personally get much more contrast when I view with the black T-shirt draped over my head and over the telescope.
Here are two images of the telescopes and the Styrofoam plate, and two images (from the first week of June) I shot during that observing session, one with the PST and one with the Herschel-wedge. Click on the images to enlarge!




Posted by
Math on 07/27 at 06:13 AM |
(0)
Comments |
filed in:
Solar scraps |
Print
Sunday, July 16, 2006
Sagittarius treasure trove
Last weekend Leo and I went into the field just 2 miles down the road to do some deep sky observing. On Friday we just took our binoculars, because our major goal for the night was to see what this site (which we never visited before) had to offer. Although there where some streetlights visible a few miles away, the big plus for the site was that we had a 360 degree horizon. However, there seemed to be a lot of dust particles in the air because it was impossible to see any stars below 30 to 35 degrees towards the horizon.
On Saturday, we gave it another try, and we were in for a few big surprises! We drove up in our car around 22.00hrs local time and the Sun had just disappeared below the northwestern horizon. When we got out of our car what did we see: some distant streetlights, a fully lit church tower in the distance, some 20 to 30 red lights from a wind park and ……. a big campfire at the local “radio-controlled airplane” club. They had their annual summer-barbecue I guess.
However, the biggest surprise was still to come. As it grew darker, we saw that the sky was much clearer, more transparent, than the night before. Around 23.00hrs we detected the outline of the Teapot (Sagittarius), and a good part of Scorpius was also visible. In the northeast, Capella was already above the horizon, which we didn’t see until 00.15hrs the night before! I started to get really excited, and got the 85mm Zeiss with the 20-60 zoom-eyepiece out, and mounted it on the Manfrotto photo-tripod. Leo had his Sky-mirror with the 15x80 Vixen big binocular mounted. And what did we locate in Sagittarius with these small instruments under these “mediocre” light conditions in the middle of July? Well, it was amazing to be honest. Without too much trouble we spotted M28, M22, M25, M24, M18, M17, M16, M8, M20 and M21. (see the map below, click to enlarge). I couldn’t believe my eyes. Even the nebulosity of M8, M16 and M17 was easy to see, without the use of filters!

Image created with SkyTools 2 by CapellaSoft
On Friday night Sagittarius had been completely lost in the haze, and now there they where, a whole bunch of celestial treasures to be seen with 80mm binoculars and an 85mm birding-scope. We only used some red LED's, a German star-atlas and Sue French’s “Celestial Sampler”, to locate the objects. Oh, by the way, we also used the streetlights on the horizon as points of orientation, and the fully lit church tower in the distance also came in handy for reading the time
This proved to me that air pollution is much more an issue for amateur astronomers than light pollution. I had seen all the Messier object in Sagittarius on a star party in Austria last year, but I never had seen them all from my own hometown. Incredible! Anyway, what I also liked very much about the site last night was the 360-degree horizon. Around 00.00 hours local time we where in for another wonderful sight. The Moon came up over the horizon, and I mean really over the horizon. It was the first time ever for me to see the moon touching the skyline, no haze, no clouds, just a beautiful yellow-orange Moon, and on top of that, a set of big rotating wind turbines where visible as big moving silhouettes against the Moon.
Around 02.00 hours we ended our observing session with a few of our all time favorites, M 27, the double cluster in Perseus, the Coathanger, M 31 and Albireo. Astronomy in the suburbs can still be very rewarding.
« Collapse
Posted by
Math on 07/16 at 06:39 AM |
(1)
Comments |
filed in:
Deepsky log |
Print
Friday, June 09, 2006
My 20 favorite double and multiple stars, part 5: winter
17. Rigel (Beta Orionis, Struve 668, double star)
Constellation Orion, also known as the Hunter), magnitude 0.1 / 6.8, separation 9.5”, position angle 202°, RA 05h14m DEC -8°.12’. The primary star, the class B8 supergiant Rigel, is the seventh brightest star in the sky, and it is the brightest star in Orion. In my 8-inch Klevtzov it looks white, but in my 85mm Zeiss reflector, I definitely see a hint of blue. The secondary, using the 8-inch Klevtzov at 166x, also looks bluish-white.
18. Trapezium (Theta Orionis, multiple star)
Constellation Orion (also known as the Hunter), magnitude AB 6.7 / 7.9 and CD 5.1 / 6.7, separation AB 8.8” and CD 13.4”, position angle AB 31° / CD 241°, RA 05h35m DEC -5°23’. This group of blazing young stars, known as the Trapezium, doesn’t need an introduction. The trapezium is a group of four bright white stars at the heart of the Orion Nebula. Even in my 85mm refractor at 30x I can see them as four individual stars, forming a trapezium. The magnitude 5.1 C component stands out from the other three fainter stars in the 85mm reflector. Under a real dark sky, I have seen the E and F component in my 8-inch TAL 200K using medium to high magnifications. This group of stars is just wonderful through almost every telescope.
19. Beta Monocerotis (triple star)
Constellation Monoceros (Unicorn), magnitude 4.7 / 5.2 / 7.1, separation AB 7.3” and BC 2.8”, position angle AB 132° and BC 106°, RA 06h29m DEC -07°02’. Sir William Herschel discovered Beta Monocerotis in 1781, and called it “one of the most beautiful sights in the heavens”, and I can only agree with him. I have been observing this wonderful triple in Monoceros on every possible occasion, just enjoying the view: three almost equally bright stars with the same blue-white color. The A, B and C component form a narrow triangle, and I never found another group of three stars that are so close together, equally bright and of exactly the same color. With my 8-inch telescope I use a magnification of 166x to get a real nice split.
20. Castor (Alpha Geminorum, Struve 1110, triple star)
Constellation Gemini (Twins), magnitude 1.9 / 2.9 / 8.8, separation AB 4.0” and AC 72.5” , position angle AB 68° and AC 164°, RA 07h34m DEC +31°53’. In fact, Castor is a system of six stars. Three of them are visible through amateur telescopes, the A,B and C components. Each of the three visible stars is itself a spectroscopic binary. The faint c-component is in fact a pair of red dwarfs orbiting each other, an eclipsing binary (variable star) designated YY Geminorum. Through my 8-inch telescope at 200x all three components look white.

Image from SkyTools2 by CapellaSoft, click to enlarge!
« Collapse
Posted by
Math on 06/09 at 11:34 AM |
(1)
Comments |
filed in:
Deepsky observing |
Print
Monday, May 29, 2006
My 20 favorite double and multiple stars, part 4: autumn
13. Eta Cassiopeia (S)truve 60, double star)
Constellation Cassiopeia, magnitude 3.4 / 7.5, separation 12.9”, position angle 317°. RA 00h49m DEC +57°49’. This beautiful double was discovered first by William Herschel in 1779. At the moment, both components of Eta Cassiopeiae are separated 12.9”. Calculations based on observations show that the separation varies from 5” (in 1890) to approximately 16” in 2150. The period of the apparent orbit is somewhere between 480 and 520 years. In different observing reports the colors of both components are reported as gold or yellow for the primary and orange or red for the secondary. I only observed it once, under mediocre circumstances, with the 8-inch Klevtzov-Cassegrain. To me they both looked “golden”.
14. Gamma Arietis (Struve 180, Mesarthim, double star)
Constellation Aries (Ram), magnitude 4.8 / 4.7, separation 7.8”, position angle 0°. RA 01h53m DEC +19°18’. Gamma Arietis was probably one of the earliest discovered double stars. Robert Hooke stumbled into it by accident, while following a comet in 1664. Last year, I observed quite a few interesting doubles in Aries myself, but the two white, almost equally bright stars of Gamma Arietis are my favorite. With my 8-inch telescope at 166x both the primary and the secondary look like sparkling white diamonds set against a jet-black sky.
15. Almach (Gamma Andromedae, multiple star)
Constellation Andromeda, magnitude 2.3 / 5.5, separation 9.8”, position angle 63°, RA 02h03m DEC +42°19’. Almach is in fact a multiple star with three components, but the C component can only be detected with larger telescopes. The primary star of Almach is a golden or yellow K2 or K3 type of star, the secondary looks bluish in my 8-inch, but there are many observers that detect a definite green color in the secondary.
16. Iota Cassiopeia (triple star)
Constellation Cassiopeia, magnitude ABC 4.6 / 6.9 / 8.4, separation AB 2.5” / AC 7.2”, position angle AB 230° / AC 114°, RA 02h29m DEC +67°24’. This is one of the finest triple stars that I have observed until now, and it is certainly the most beautiful in the Cassiopeia area. With the 8-inch Tal 200K at 222x I split Iota Cassiopeiae into a bright white primary with a slight hint of yellow, and two white companions showing a hint of blue.

Image from SkyTools 2 by CapellaSoft, click to enlarge!
« Collapse
Posted by
Math on 05/29 at 07:42 PM |
(0)
Comments |
filed in:
Deepsky observing |
Print